Bill Taylor Bill Taylor's Page de profil

Bill Taylor Bill Taylor

0 Cours inscrits • 0 Cours terminé

Biographie

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dump, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증자료

Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험을 패스하고 싶다면KoreaDumps에서 출시한Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I덤프가 필수이겠죠. Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험을 통과하여 원하는 자격증을 취득하시면 회사에서 자기만의 위치를 단단하게 하여 인정을 받을수 있습니다.이 점이 바로 많은 IT인사들이Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험에 도전하는 원인이 아닐가 싶습니다. KoreaDumps에서 출시한Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I덤프 실제시험의 거의 모든 문제를 커버하고 있어 최고의 인기와 사랑을 받고 있습니다. 어느사이트의Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I공부자료도KoreaDumps제품을 대체할수 없습니다.학원등록 필요없이 다른 공부자료 필요없이 덤프에 있는 문제만 완벽하게 공부하신다면Salesforce인증 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험패스가 어렵지 않고 자격증취득이 쉬워집니다.

Salesforce인증MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험을 패스함으로 취업에는 많은 도움이 됩니다. KoreaDumps는Salesforce인증MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험패스로 꿈을 이루어주는 사이트입니다. 우리는Salesforce인증MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험의 문제와 답은 아주 좋은 학습자료로도 충분한 문제집입니다. 여러분이 안전하게 간단하게Salesforce인증MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험을 응시할 수 있는 자료입니다.

>> MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dump <<

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증자료 - MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험

KoreaDumps는Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험을 아주 쉽게 패스할 수 있도록 도와드리는 사이트입니다. KoreaDumps의 엘리트한 전문가가 끈임 없는 노력으로 최고의Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I자료를 만들었습니다. 이 자료로 여러분은 100%Salesforce의MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험을 패스할 수 있으며, KoreaDumps을 선택함으로 성공을 선택한 것입니다. KoreaDumps가 제공하는 시험가이드로 효과적인 학습으로 많은 분들이 모두 인증시험을 패스하였습니다. 이건 모두 KoreaDumps 인증시험덤프로 공부하였기 때문입니다. 그 중Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험을 패스한 분들도 모두 KoreaDumps인증시험덤프를 사용하였기 때문입니다.

Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 시험요강:

주제
소개

주제 1

Governing Web APIs on Anypoint Platform: This topic includes sub-topics related to managing API instances and environments, selecting API policies, enforcing API policies, securing APIs, and understanding OAuth 2.0 relationships.

주제 2

Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations: Advising on a Center for Enablement (C4E) and identifying KPIs, describing MuleSoft Catalyst's structure, comparing Identity and Client Management options, and identifying data residency types are essential sub-topics.

주제 3

Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks: It discusses Anypoint Platform components for data generation, collected metrics, and key alerts. This topic also includes specifying alerts to define Mule applications.

주제 4

Deploying API Implementations to CloudHub: Understanding Object Store usage, selecting worker sizes, predicting app reliability and performance, and comparing load balancers. Avoiding single points of failure in deployments is also its sub-topic.

주제 5

Designing APIs Using System, Process, and Experience Layers: Identifying suitable APIs for business processes, assigning them according to functional focus, and recommending data model approaches are its sub-topics.

주제 6

Explaining Application Network Basics: This topic includes sub-topics related to identifying and differentiating between technologies for API-led connectivity, describing the role and characteristics of web APIs, assigning APIs to tiers, and understanding Anypoint Platform components.

주제 7

Designing and Sharing APIs: Identifying dependencies between API components, creating and publishing reusable API assets, mapping API data models between Bounded Contexts, and recognizing idempotent HTTP methods.

최신 Salesforce MuleSoft MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 무료샘플문제 (Q85-Q90):

질문 # 85
An organization requires several APIs to be secured with OAuth 2.0, and PingFederate has been identified as the identity provider for API client authorization, The PingFederate Client Provider is configured in access management, and the PingFederate OAuth 2.0 Token Enforcement policy is configured for the API instances required by the organization. The API instances reside in two business groups (Group A and Group B) within the Master Organization (Master Org).
What should be done to allow API consumers to access the API instances?

A. The API administrator should configure the correct client discovery URL in both child business groups, and the API consumer should request access to the API in Ping Identity
B. The API administrator should grant access to the API consumers by creating contracts in the relevant API instances in API Manager
C. The APT consumer should create a client application and request access to the API in Ping Identity, and the organization's Ping Identity workflow will grant access
D. The APL consumer should create a client application and request access to the APT in Anypoint Exchange, and the API administrator should approve the request

정답：D

설명：
OAuth 2.0 and PingFederate Setup:
The organization uses PingFederate as the identity provider, integrated with Anypoint Platform for OAuth 2.0 authentication and authorization.
The PingFederate OAuth 2.0 Token Enforcement policy is applied to the API instances, requiring clients to be registered and authenticated via PingFederate.
Accessing Secured APIs:
API consumers need to register their client applications in Anypoint Exchange to request access to the secured APIs.
The API administrator then reviews and approves the access request in API Manager. This grants the client application a contract, allowing it to access the API using OAuth 2.0 tokens issued by PingFederate.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Configuring the client discovery URL in child business groups is not relevant to granting access; this is part of setting up PingFederate, not managing consumer access.
Option B: While creating contracts in API Manager is necessary, this option lacks the detail about the process in Anypoint Exchange, where consumers request access.
Option C (Correct Answer): API consumers must create a client application in Anypoint Exchange to request access to the API, and the API administrator then approves the request in API Manager.
Option D: The access request and approval process happens within Anypoint Platform (Exchange and API Manager), not directly in Ping Identity.
Conclusion:
Option C is the correct answer as it accurately describes the process within Anypoint Platform where API consumers request access through Exchange, and the API administrator approves it.
Refer to MuleSoft's documentation on OAuth 2.0 setup with PingFederate and managing API client access in Exchange and API Manager.

질문 # 86
An API client calls one method from an existing API implementation. The API implementation is later updated. What change to the API implementation would require the API client's invocation logic to also be updated?

A. When a new required field is added to the method called by the API client
B. When a new method is added to the resource used by the API client
C. When the data type of the response is changed for the method called by the API client
D. When a child method is added to the method called by the API client

정답：A

설명：
Correct Answer : When a new required field is added to the method called by the API client
*****************************************
>> Generally, the logic on API clients need to be updated when the API contract breaks.
>> When a new method or a child method is added to an API , the API client does not break as it can still continue to use its existing method. So these two options are out.
>> We are left for two more where "datatype of the response if changed" and "a new required field is added".
>> Changing the datatype of the response does break the API contract. However, the question is insisting on the "invocation" logic and not about the response handling logic. The API client can still invoke the API successfully and receive the response but the response will have a different datatype for some field.
>> Adding a new required field will break the API's invocation contract. When adding a new required field, the API contract breaks the RAML or API spec agreement that the API client/API consumer and API provider has between them. So this requires the API client invocation logic to also be updated.

질문 # 87
Which scenario is suited for MUnit tests instead of integration tests?

A. For read-only interactions to any dependencies (such as other web APIs)
B. When no mocking is permissible
C. When testing does not require knowledge of implementation details
D. For tests that are implemented using SoapUI

정답：A

설명：
MUnit is MuleSoft's testing framework for creating and running automated tests within Anypoint Studio. It is specifically designed for unit testing Mule applications and is best suited when testing doesn't require understanding the inner workings or implementation details of the components being tested.
Ideal Use Cases for MUnit:
MUnit is optimal when testing individual flows, functions, or components in isolation. This type of testing focuses on verifying the behavior of each unit without needing to understand the complete system.
Since unit tests do not require external integrations or dependencies to be live, mocking is commonly used in MUnit to simulate the behavior of external services and APIs.
Why Option B is Correct:
Option B aligns with the concept of unit testing, where the emphasis is on testing functionality rather than system integration. Integration tests, on the other hand, would require implementation knowledge and live endpoints, making them unsuitable for MUnit's scope.
of Incorrect Options:
Option A (read-only interactions) and Option C (no mocking) do not suit MUnit's typical testing environment as MUnit is designed with mocking capabilities to simulate dependencies.
Option D (SoapUI-based tests) suggests an external testing tool, while MUnit is specific to MuleSoft.
Reference
For more on MUnit best practices, refer to MuleSoft's MUnit documentation.

질문 # 88
4 Production environment is running on a dedicated Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) on CloudHub 1,0, and the security team guidelines clearly state no traffic on HTTP.
Which two options support these security guidelines?
Choose 2 answers

A. Add the entry in the VPC firewall rule.
B. Create a custom policy to apply to outgoing and incoming HTTP requests to control access to a configured API endpoint
C. Configure the HTTPS protocol in HTTP listener in the Mule application
D. Configure the IP Blocklist policy to control access to a configured API endpoint from either a single IP address or a range of IP addresses.
E. Remove the entry from the VPC firewall rule

정답：C,E

설명：
Security Guidelines Overview:
The production environment is hosted on a dedicated Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) on CloudHub 1.0, with a specific requirement from the security team that no traffic should occur over HTTP. This implies that only secure HTTPS traffic should be permitted, and HTTP access (port 8081, the default HTTP port in Mule applications) should be disabled.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A (Correct Answer): Configuring the HTTPS protocol in the HTTP listener in the Mule application ensures that all traffic is encrypted and occurs over HTTPS (port 8092 by default for HTTPS on Mule applications). This directly aligns with the security guideline to prevent unencrypted HTTP traffic.
Option B: Creating a custom policy for incoming and outgoing HTTP requests could provide some control over access, but it does not enforce the use of HTTPS exclusively. This option does not disable HTTP traffic and, therefore, does not meet the guideline effectively.
Option C (Correct Answer): Removing the entry for HTTP (port 8081) in the VPC firewall rule ensures that HTTP traffic is completely blocked at the firewall level. This prevents any HTTP requests from reaching the application, adding a layer of security that complies with the guidelines.
Option D: The IP Blocklist policy controls access based on IP addresses but does not enforce the use of HTTPS. This policy does not address the specific requirement of preventing HTTP traffic.
Option E: Adding a firewall rule entry for HTTP (port 8081) would enable HTTP traffic, which directly contradicts the security guidelines. Therefore, this option should be avoided.
Conclusion:
Option A and Option C are the correct choices. Configuring the HTTPS protocol in the Mule application's HTTP listener ensures that only HTTPS traffic is allowed, and removing the firewall rule for HTTP (port 8081) blocks any HTTP traffic from reaching the application. Together, these options enforce secure traffic as required by the security guidelines.
Refer to MuleSoft documentation on configuring HTTP listeners and managing VPC firewall rules for further details on implementing these security controls.

질문 # 89
An API implementation is being designed that must invoke an Order API, which is known to repeatedly experience downtime.
For this reason, a fallback API is to be called when the Order API is unavailable.
What approach to designing the invocation of the fallback API provides the best resilience?

A. Search Anypoint Exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the Order API
B. Create a separate entry for the Order API in API Manager, and then invoke this API as a fallback API if the primary Order API is unavailable
C. Redirect client requests through an HTTP 307 Temporary Redirect status code to the fallback API whenever the Order API is unavailable
D. Set an option in the HTTP Requester component that invokes the Order API to instead invoke a fallback API whenever an HTTP 4xx or 5xx response status code is returned from the Order API

정답：A

설명：
Correct Answer : Search Anypoint exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the order API
*****************************************
>> It is not ideal and good approach, until unless there is a pre-approved agreement with the API clients that they will receive a HTTP 3xx temporary redirect status code and they have to implement fallback logic their side to call another API.
>> Creating separate entry of same Order API in API manager would just create an another instance of it on top of same API implementation. So, it does NO GOOD by using clone od same API as a fallback API. Fallback API should be ideally a different API implementation that is not same as primary one.
>> There is NO option currently provided by Anypoint HTTP Connector that allows us to invoke a fallback API when we receive certain HTTP status codes in response.
The only statement TRUE in the given options is to Search Anypoint exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the order API.

질문 # 90
......

우리KoreaDumps의 덤프는 여러분이Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험응시에 도움이 되시라고 제공되는 것입니다, 우라KoreaDumps에서 제공되는 학습가이드에는Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험관연 정보기술로 여러분이 이 분야의 지식 장악에 많은 도움이 될 것이며 또한 아주 정확한Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I시험문제와 답으로 여러분은 한번에 안전하게 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다,Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증시험을 아주 높은 점수로 패스할 것을 보장해 드립니다,

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I인증자료: https://www.koreadumps.com/MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I_exam-braindumps.html

Bill Taylor Bill Taylor

Biographie

Quick Links

Resources

Support