Phil Nelson Phil Nelson's Page de profil

Phil Nelson Phil Nelson

0 Cours inscrits • 0 Cours terminé

Biographie

CIPP-E受験対策書、CIPP-E対応問題集

2025年Xhs1991の最新CIPP-E PDFダンプおよびCIPP-E試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OMzA2bIkCJvMZjiN3ymiRtzEKDzQcdX0

早急にCIPP-E認定試験に出席し、特定の分野での仕事に適格であることを証明する証明書を取得する必要があります。 CIPP-E学習教材を購入すると、ほとんど問題なくテストに合格します。当社のCIPP-E学習教材は、高い合格率とヒット率を高めるため、テストにあまり合格しなくても心配する必要はありません。購入前に無料トライアルを提供しています。 CIPP-E練習エンジンのメリットと機能をさらに理解するには、製品の紹介を詳細にご覧ください。

認定情報プライバシープロフェッショナル/ヨーロッパ（CIPP/E）認定は、プライバシーの知識と専門知識を促進したい個人にとって不可欠な資格です。国際プライバシー専門家協会（IAPP）は、欧州連合の一般データ保護規則（GDPR）の習熟を実証したい専門家にCIPP/E認定試験を提供しています。認定試験は、GDPRとヨーロッパで活動している企業に対するその意味を深く理解するための優れた方法です。

>> CIPP-E受験対策書 <<

CIPP-E受験対策書 & 認証の成功を保証, 簡単なトレーニング方法 & CIPP-E対応問題集

Xhs1991にIT業界のエリートのグループがあって、彼達は自分の経験と専門知識を使ってIAPP CIPP-E認証試験に参加する方に対して問題集を研究続けています。

IAPP CIPP-E認定試験は、ヨーロッパの情報プライバシー法と規制を専門とする専門家のための世界的に認められた認定です。この認定は、世界最大かつ最も尊敬されるプライバシー協会である国際プライバシー専門家協会（IAPP）によって提供されています。 CIPP-E認定は、EU一般データ保護規則（GDPR）を含むヨーロッパのデータ保護法と規制を包括的に理解するように設計されています。

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) 認定 CIPP-E 試験問題 (Q26-Q31):

質問 # 26
In which situation would a data controller most likely be able to justify the processing of the data of a child without parental consent?

A. When the data is to be processed for market research.
B. When providing preventive or counselling services to the child.
C. When a legitimate business interest makes obtaining consent impractical.
D. When providing the child with materials purely for educational use.

正解：B

質問 # 27
Which of the following is NOT a role of works councils?

A. Determining the monetary fines to be levied against employers for data breach violations of employee data.
B. Determining whether employees' personal data can be processed or not.
C. Determining what changes will affect employee working conditions.
D. Determining whether to approve or reject certain decisions of the employer that affect employees.

正解：B

質問 # 28
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Due to rapidly expanding workforce, Company A has decided to outsource its payroll function to Company B. Company B is an established payroll service provider with a sizable client base and a solid reputation in the industry.
Company B's payroll solution for Company A relies on the collection of time and attendance data obtained via a biometric entry system installed in each of Company A's factories. Company B won't hold any biometric data itself, but the related data will be uploaded to Company B's UK servers and used to provide the payroll service. Company B's live systems will contain the following information for each of Company A's employees:
Name
Address
Date of Birth
Payroll number
National Insurance number
Sick pay entitlement
Maternity/paternity pay entitlement
Holiday entitlement
Pension and benefits contributions
Trade union contributions
Jenny is the compliance officer at Company A. She first considers whether Company A needs to carry out a data protection impact assessment in relation to the new time and attendance system, but isn't sure whether or not this is required.
Jenny does know, however, that under the GDPR there must be a formal written agreement requiring Company B to use the time and attendance data only for the purpose of providing the payroll service, and to apply appropriate technical and organizational security measures for safeguarding the data. Jenny suggests that Company B obtain advice from its data protection officer. The company doesn't have a DPO but agrees, in the interest of finalizing the contract, to sign up for the provisions in full. Company A enters into the contract.
Weeks later, while still under contract with Company A, Company B embarks upon a separate project meant to enhance the functionality of its payroll service, and engages Company C to help. Company C agrees to extract all personal data from Company B's live systems in order to create a new database for Company B.
This database will be stored in a test environment hosted on Company C's U.S. server. The two companies agree not to include any data processing provisions in their services agreement, as data is only being used for IT testing purposes.
Unfortunately, Company C's U.S. server is only protected by an outdated IT security system, and suffers a cyber security incident soon after Company C begins work on the project. As a result, data relating to Company A's employees is visible to anyone visiting Company C's website. Company A is unaware of this until Jenny receives a letter from the supervisory authority in connection with the investigation that ensues. As soon as Jenny is made aware of the breach, she notifies all affected employees.
Under the GDPR, which of Company B's actions would NOT be likely to trigger a potential enforcement action?

A. Their omission of data protection provisions in their contract with Company C.
B. Their engagement of Company C to improve their payroll service.
C. Their failure to provide sufficient security safeguards to Company A's data.
D. Their decision to operate without a data protection officer.

正解：B

質問 # 29
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
T-Craze, a German-headquartered specialty t-shirt company, was successfully selling to large German metropolitan cities. However, after a recent merger with another German-based company that was selling to a broader European market, T-Craze revamped its marketing efforts to sell to a wider audience. These efforts included a complete redesign of its logo to reflect the recent merger, and improvements to its website meant to capture more information about visitors through the use of cookies.
T-Craze also opened various office locations throughout Europe to help expand its business. While Germany Target, a renowned marketing firm based in the Philippines, to run its latest marketing campaign. After thorough research, Right Target determined that T-Craze is most successful with customers between the ages of 18 and 22. Thus, its first campaign targeted university students in several European capitals, which yielded nearly 40% new customers for T-Craze in one quarter. Right Target also ran subsequent campaigns for T- Craze, though with much less success.
The last two campaigns included a wider demographic group and resulted in countless unsubscribe requests, including a large number in Spain. In fact, the Spanish data protection authority received a complaint from Sofia, a mid-career investment banker. Sofia was upset after receiving a marketing communication even after unsubscribing from such communications from the Right Target on behalf of T-Craze.
What is the best option for the lead regulator when responding to the Spanish supervisory authority's notice that it plans to take action regarding Sofia's complaint?

A. Reject, because GDPR does not allow other supervisory authorities to take action if there is a lead authority.
B. Accept, because it did not receive any complaints.
C. Reject, because Right Target's processing was conducted throughout Europe.
D. Accept, because GDPR permits non-lead authorities to take action for such complaints.

正解：D

解説：
According to the Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 16, "the GDPR provides for a one-stop-shop mechanism, which means that a controller or processor with establishments in several Member States will have only one supervisory authority as its interlocutor, which will act as the lead authority. However, this does not mean that the lead authority has exclusive competence to supervise all processing activities of the controller or processor throughout the EU. The GDPR also allows for the possibility of a relevant and reasoned objection by a concerned supervisory authority, which may trigger the consistency mechanism and the involvement of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). Moreover, the GDPR recognizes the right of any supervisory authority to adopt urgent measures on its own territory or to commence legal proceedings before a court in its Member State in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects." Therefore, the lead regulator should accept the Spanish supervisory authority's notice that it plans to take action regarding Sofia's complaint, as the GDPR permits non-lead authorities to take action for such complaints, especially when they involve urgent measures or legal proceedings to protect the data subjects' rights and freedoms. The other options are incorrect, as they do not reflect the GDPR's provisions on the one-stop-shop mechanism and the cooperation and consistency mechanisms. Reference:
Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 16
GDPR, Articles 56, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 and 66

質問 # 30
To comply with the GDPR and the EU Court of Justice's decision in Schrems II, the European Commission issued what are commonly referred to as the new standard contractual clauses (SCCs). As a result, businesses must do all of the following EXCEPT?

A. Migrate all contracts entered into before September 27, 2021, that use the old SCCs to the new SCCs by December 27, 2022.
B. Implement the new SCCs in the U.K. following Brexit, as the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office does not have the authority to publish its own set of SCCs.
C. Consider the new optional docking clause, which expressly permits adding new parties to the SCCs.
D. Take steps to flow down the new SCCs to relevant parts of their supply chain using the new SCCs as of September 27, 2021, if the business is a data importer.

正解：B

解説：
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces a mechanism for personal data transfers to third countries or international organisations that do not ensure an adequate level of data protection, based on approved certifications. According to Article 46 of the GDPR, contractual clauses ensuring appropriate data protection safeguards can be used as a ground for data transfers from the EU to third countries. This includes model contract clauses - so-called standard contractual clauses (SCCs) - that have been "pre-approved" by the European Commission.
On 4 June 2021, the Commission issued modernised standard contractual clauses under the GDPR for data transfers from controllers or processors in the EU/EEA (or otherwise subject to the GDPR) to controllers or processors established outside the EU/EEA (and not subject to the GDPR). These modernised SCCs replace the three sets of SCCs that were adopted under the previous Data Protection Directive 95/46. The Commission developed Questions and Answers (Q&As) to provide practical guidance on the use of the SCCs and assist stakeholders in their compliance efforts under the GDPR.
The Q&As state that businesses must do all of the following:
Consider the new optional docking clause, which expressly permits adding new parties to the SCCs.
According to the Q&As, the docking clause allows controllers and processors that are not part of the original contract to accede to the SCCs at a later stage, either as data exporters or importers. This clause is intended to facilitate the use of the SCCs in complex processing chains and to avoid the need to enter into multiple contracts.
Migrate all contracts entered into before September 27, 2021, that use the old SCCs to the new SCCs by December 27, 2022. According to the Q&As, the old SCCs will be repealed on September 27, 2021.
However, contracts concluded before that date on the basis of the old SCCs will remain valid until December
27, 2022, provided that the processing operations that are the subject matter of the contract remain unchanged and that reliance on those clauses ensures that the transfer of personal data is subject to appropriate safeguards within the meaning of Article 46(1) of the GDPR. After December 27, 2022, the old SCCs will no longer provide a valid legal basis for data transfers to third countries, and the new SCCs will have to be used instead.
Take steps to flow down the new SCCs to relevant parts of their supply chain using the new SCCs as of September 27, 2021, if the business is a data importer. According to the Q&As, the new SCCs require data importers to enter into contracts with any subprocessors that process the personal data transferred under the SCCs, and to include in those contracts the same data protection obligations as those imposed on the data importer under the SCCs. This means that data importers must ensure that the new SCCs are flowed down to their subprocessors as of September 27, 2021, and that any changes in the subprocessors are notified to the data exporter, who has the right to object.
The Q&As do not state that businesses must do the following:
Implement the new SCCs in the U.K. following Brexit, as the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office does not have the authority to publish its own set of SCCs. This is not a valid statement, as the U.K. has its own data protection regime after leaving the EU, and the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has the power to issue its own SCCs for data transfers from the U.K. to third countries. According to the ICO website, the ICO is currently developing bespoke U.K. SCCs, which will be subject to a public consultation and an opinion from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). Until the U.K. SCCs are finalised, the ICO advises businesses to continue to use the EU SCCs for new contracts, as these clauses have been recognised as a valid transfer mechanism under the U.K. data protection law. However, the ICO also warns businesses that they may need to amend the EU SCCs to reflect that the U.K. is no longer an EU member state, and that they will need to update their contracts to the U.K. SCCs once they are available.
References:
GDPR, Articles 3, 4, 28, 29, 32, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49.
New Standard Contractual Clauses - Questions and Answers overview, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.
Standard Contractual Clauses (SCC), paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
[Using international data transfers], paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

質問 # 31
......

CIPP-E対応問題集: https://www.xhs1991.com/CIPP-E.html

さらに、Xhs1991 CIPP-Eダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OMzA2bIkCJvMZjiN3ymiRtzEKDzQcdX0

Phil Nelson Phil Nelson

Biographie

Quick Links

Resources

Support